Tech & Appsbreaking news
One positron, held for months: Northwestern physicists trap a single antimatter particle
Northwestern researchers kept one antimatter particle suspended in a vacuum for months, and any mismatch with its ordinary twin would show that the Standard Model is incomplete.

What happened
A team of physicists trapped a single antimatter particle for months. [1] The work was done by researchers at Northwestern University, and the findings were published in Physical Review Letters. [2][1] Gerald Gabrielse is the lead researcher on the experiment. [1]
The particle is a positron, the antimatter counterpart of the electron. [2] The two have exactly the same mass, but their electric charges are opposite. [2]
Why antimatter is hard to hold
Antimatter is hard to study because it is destroyed on contact with ordinary matter. [3] It explodes when it meets ordinary matter. [1] Any container with walls would therefore end the experiment.
The team avoided walls entirely. [1] They suspended the positron in a Penning trap, which uses electric and magnetic fields to hold a particle in the middle of an empty, nearly perfect vacuum. [3] The device is called a one-positron quantum cyclotron, and it keeps the particle floating without touching anything. [1][2]
Catching and cooling the particle
The source of the positrons was sodium-22, a radioactive isotope whose decay emits positrons with great energy. [3] The researchers first caught a particle as it shot out of the radioactive material. [1] Slowing it enough to catch it was the hardest part of the experiment. [1]
Once caught, the particle was cooled to 0.3 degrees above absolute zero. [1] The trap was chilled to about the same temperature. [3] Loading a positron takes 8 to 11 hours with the team's simple, low-intensity source. [3]
Controlling the quantum states
The cold lets the team control the particle's quantum states precisely without touching it. [2] The experiment put the positron into its lowest possible energy state. [1] That allowed scientists to control it for months without destroying it. [1]
The team used tuned microwaves to move the positron up its energy ladder and flip its spin. [3] The size of the frequency shifts indicated that only one positron was in the trap. [3] Physicists manipulated its quantum states one jump at a time. [3]
Keeping the particle for months lets the researchers repeat measurements. [2] Physicists have made very precise measurements with electrons, but reaching the same precision with positrons has proven more difficult. [2]
What a mismatch would mean
Mathematics predicts that every particle of matter has an equivalent antiparticle, and scientists have verified this experimentally. [2] The Standard Model predicts that electrons and positrons should be perfect mirror images, a principle known as CPT symmetry. [3] A mismatch between the magnetic moments of the electron and positron would show that the theory is incomplete. [3]
The study aims to learn whether antimatter behaves differently than the matter it mirrors. [1] Almost everything observed is made of ordinary matter, and the reason is still unknown. [2] Under the Big Bang theory, matter and antimatter should have wiped each other out billions of years ago. [1] The Big Bang should have created equal amounts of both, yet nearly everything is regular matter, and this result could help address that. [1]
Scientists have increasingly doubted the Big Bang theory and have theorized that the universe may have been created by a bounce inside a black hole. [1]
What it means for you
If you follow particle physics, the number to watch is the comparison between the electron and positron measurements. [1] Gabrielse said current theories suggest there will be no difference between the two measurements. [1] He said that if the two are not equal, it would be the biggest discovery in physics in the last century. [1]
So far the antimatter has not acted any differently than a normal electron. [1] The experiment has not revealed any unexpected differences between the two particles. [2] The full findings are in Physical Review Letters. [1]
Sources
Written from the sources above and checked twice before publishing. How we work · Report an error